top of page

AI, Community and Growth

  • Foto do escritor: Gustavo Reis
    Gustavo Reis
  • 29 de set. de 2025
  • 3 min de leitura

I spoke with a CEO last week. Turnover around £4 million, team of 120, solid product. He told me: "We're using AI in a few areas, our NPS is decent, but I feel like we're playing chess whilst others are inventing an entirely new game."


His feeling isn't paranoia. It's clarity.


Because whilst most companies treat AI as a "tool" and community as a "marketing channel", a select few are restructuring their entire business as adaptive ecosystems — organisms that learn, react, and create value exponentially.


What's actually changed


I recently read Co-Intelligence by Ethan Mollick and Read Write Own by Chris Dixon. Two books, two powerful theses: Mollick proposes we treat AI as a strategic partner, not merely automation. Dixon argues the internet has entered the ownership era — beyond reading and writing, we can now own assets, data, networks.


Crossing these ideas with what I see daily across dozens of companies, I've spotted a pattern: those winning aren't the ones with the best isolated AI or the largest community. They're the ones who've made these two layers talk to each other.


Practical example: A corporate education company I work with began using AI to personalise learning paths in real-time. Nothing revolutionary. But then they did something different: they opened a co-creation model where learners themselves suggest improvements to paths and, when approved, earn credits that unlock premium features or become discounts. The AI processes suggestions, identifies patterns, tests variations. The community feels ownership. The cycle accelerates. Result: CAC dropped 40%, LTV rose 65% in 8 months.


It wasn't magic. It was architecture.


The two layers that matter


Companies pulling ahead structure their businesses across two integrated levels:


Intelligent, embedding AI at every decision point. From customer service to product, from growth experiments to churn analysis. Co-intelligence isn't backstage — it shapes how the company thinks and acts. And this doesn't require big tech budgets. It requires a mentality of constant experimentation.


Participatory, creating genuine mechanisms of ownership and engagement. Customers cease being spectators. Collaborators don't just execute — they co-create. Partners share risk and reward. This might range from ambassador programmes with real governance to revenue share models with early adopters.


The fusion of these layers creates companies that learn faster, innovate more consistently, and build competitive advantages that are difficult to replicate.


Growth and marketing as the nervous system


In this model, growth and marketing shift from "demand generation" to becoming the company's engine of intelligence and connection.


AI as an experiment accelerator. A fintech I work with reduced their campaign testing cycle from 3 weeks to 4 days. They didn't hire an army of data scientists — they used Claude and GPT-4 to generate variations, analyse behaviour, and adjust messaging. The growth team became orchestrators, not executors.


Communities as strategic assets. A supplements brand created a council of 50 customers who co-develop products. They receive early access, participate in formulation decisions, and earn symbolic equity (lifetime discount percentage proportional to contribution impact). This group's CAC? Zero. Retention? 94% after 2 years.


Accelerating learning loops. Each interaction generates data. AI interprets patterns. Growth tests hypotheses. The community validates or rejects. The cycle closes and restarts faster. Companies mastering this create competitive distance that capital alone can't bridge.


The missing pact


Here's what changes everything: we're not just talking about technology or marketing tactics. We're talking about business pacts.


A pact between humans and machines — where co-intelligence means collaboration, not replacement.


A pact between companies and communities — where digital ownership is shared responsibility, not just pretty storytelling.


Companies that learn to operate at these two levels will have more than efficiency or engagement. They'll have legitimacy.


And in a world where any product can be copied and any strategy replicated, legitimacy is the scarcest advantage that exists. It's what makes people choose you not because you're better, but because you're theirs.


Three questions for Monday morning


If you lead a company, it's worth pausing to answer:

  1. Is your AI merely automating or amplifying your team's intelligence? If the answer is "automating", you're underutilising it.

  2. Are your customers simply buyers or co-creators? If there aren't genuine participation mechanisms, you're leaving money and loyalty on the table.

  3. Does your growth operate in silos or orchestrate learning loops between AI, product, and community? If it's in silos, you're too slow.


Companies that breathe are those that've transformed these questions into systems. It's not about having all the answers now. It's about designing the right architecture to discover them faster than everyone else.


And the clock has already started.

 
 
 

Comentários


bottom of page